After considering the lofty topic of truth there is no harm in lightening things up with a light-hearted ice-breaker to achieve this. Students should be divided into random threes. We can hold that something is true if it: Some facility with the three most famous iterations will be very useful for analyzing TOK Knowledge Questions.ĬORRESPONDENCE, COHERENCE AND PRAGMATIC THEORIES OF TRUTH Not being able to attain it, does not mean that they should shy away from understanding some of various ways the word truth is used. Naturally, academic historians aim for truth in interpreting the traces of a past long gone but they are realistic and fully aware of the inherent limitations of their discipline.Īs embodied, fallible, human knowers we will nearly always be at some distance from "what is actually the case" or "things as they are in themselves." As the course progresses TOK students will embrace this constraint. It is not every last detail of what actually happened. For example History is what historians actually do. It is much more about real world shared knowledge-in cultural contexts and, especially, in the various Areas of Knowledge-than it is about metaphysics and eternal questions. We have already mentioned that TOK is not text-based philosophy. It soon emerges that the word “truth” can be used in various ways and in differing contexts. The pursuit of absolute certainty has an initial attraction to many beginning TOK students seeking a foundation. When questioning some of their own student knowledge claims and participating the knowledge as justified true belief session it emerged that truth is a slippery concept.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |